Collin McCall is the operator behind DailyPayService.com and the Adultwork group known as “Adultwork’s Finest Performers.” Despite the continued operation of his services, McCall has faced widespread criticism, allegations, and complaints over the years. Many of these issues have remained under the radar, with some suggesting that McCall has developed internal systems to suppress public complaints or prevent backlash from becoming widely known.
In recent years, McCall was arrested and charged in a sex abuse case but was ultimately acquitted. This information came to public attention via a group on X (formerly Twitter), who shared court listings from Belfast Crown Court, near Lisburn, where McCall is reportedly based.
Collin McCall’s Spouse – Janine McCall
Collin McCall is married to Janine McCall (née Janine Nelson). The couple reportedly met through the British escorting platform Adultwork.com, where Janine was believed to be one of the performers using McCall’s services at the time.
Janine McCall has also faced public criticism related to her involvement in DailyPayService.com and Adultwork’s Finest Performers. Various reports online suggest that she may have supported or participated in some of the alleged misconduct, including scams or inappropriate behavior toward service members.
What is DailyPayService.com?
DailyPayService.com is a platform owned by Collin McCall that manages groups on adult websites, primarily Adultwork. The service promises daily payments to webcam models and offers additional tools and features. However, numerous online reports claim that the service does not always deliver on these promises.
Common complaints include underpayment, delayed payments, and allegations of inappropriate conduct. Many users have stated that when issues arise, especially for those with smaller followings, they are removed from public forums or WhatsApp groups, making it difficult to raise concerns publicly.
There are also claims that the service is difficult to leave. Users report that attempts to exit are often met with delays, manipulative messages, or attempts to discourage them from switching to competitor services. Some allege that competitor companies have been publicly defamed as part of a broader strategy to retain members and deter criticism.
